Sorry, to cause such a fuss.  I've sent a message to Ken Sletten regarding
this issue. Like I said these we're just reports that I heard from someone
who we thought we should be listening to, and I just wanted to find the
right source to either verify or discredit them
-=mike
[log in to unmask]

DebbyG wrote in message <[log in to unmask]>...
>Hi folks!  I don't know who the source is that is saying that Turbo
>Image is "on the Manufacture Discontinue" list, but no one panic.
>It's not going away.
>
>What may be causing confusion is the discontinuance of the old
>CISC-based HP3000's made in the 70's through 80's timeframe.
>They ran an older version of TurboIMAGE called IMAGE/3000
>(thank you Fred White and crew).  If anything would be
>discontinued, it would make sense to obsolete that old version.
>TurboIMAGE was introduced in 1986, so it's been 10 years --
>plenty of time for all users to get moved from the old IMAGE
>to the current TurboIMAGE.
>
>In fact, though I can't say what the enhancements are, I think
>everyone will be very pleased with the enhancement work CSY
>is carrying on at this time.  Watch for announcements for 6.0 and
>beyond.  Why do I know or care?  I'm one of several HP
>Instructor's who teaches the TurboIMAGE class.
>
>In general, when any of our community of 3000 users hears an
>rumor or announcement of discontinuance,  make sure to ask
>if it is regarding the old CISC-based, MPE V environment.  That
>is going away (sniff).
>
>Cheers!
>
>Debby Gray -- HP Education Consultant (read instructor)
>[log in to unmask]
>
>####################################################################
>Debby Gray                                   [log in to unmask]
> (work)
>  Sunnyvale, CA                             [log in to unmask]
>   (personal)
>Me?  Opinions?  If no one else will claim them, neither will I...
>####################################################################