HP3000-L Archives

October 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fred Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 1997 17:39:24 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Re: (18 lines)
> Anyone have any experiances with the Nike model 20 disc array.
> /snip
> So my question is:  Great we have the capacity for up to 176 GB in
> one raid 5 array......what does loading it up do to overall system
> performance?  Do we need to think about spending another 20k on
> another array?


Jim,
It depends how hard you are using it? Use a performance tool to measure IO and
see how close you are to 20 physical IO's/sec. (I will confirm this figure)
I would not use a Nike for my online systems, but put it in a private volume set
for archive purposes only. I also have this idea that you can use a second SP to
split the array into two SCSI buses, but have not been able to test this.
BTW, apparantly adding extra cache does not help performance.
Regards
Fred

ATOM RSS1 RSS2