Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 30 Jul 1999 13:16:39 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Cynthia :)
Wirt would never be sarcastic.... Facetious maybe :) hehehe
Art "Weekend Anyone? hehe" Bahrs
----------
>From: Cynthia Fowler <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: HP3000 Reliability Overlooked?
>Date: Fri, 30 Jul, 1999, 11:32
>
> I think Wirt is being sarcastic. Certainly the users groups HAVE asked HP
> to advertise it to the general public.....
>
> Lee Gunter spoke the truth.
>
> Cynthia Bridges-Fowler
> MIS Operation Analyst
> IMC Global, Inc. / IMC Salt, Inc.
> [log in to unmask]
>
>>>> Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]> 07/30/99 01:11PM >>>
> Jacob asks:
>
>> I have worked for serveral companies and have administered systems on
>> serveral platforms. Needless to say, I have had some really bad
>> experiences. Recently, I have had the opportunity to do some work on
>> the HP3000 and have come to the conclusion that it is a surprisingly
>> reliable environment. I then have to wonder how many companies are
>> using this system for core business functions and why more do not.
>
> Using the HP3000 as the center of mission-critical computing has
> consistently proven to be such an extraordinary competitive advantage to a
> company that HP3000 users, both large and small, have gotten together,
> year after year, and pleaded with HP NOT to advertise the HP3000 to the
> general public.
>
> HP has generally complied.
>
> Wirt Atmar
|
|
|