Agreed: disc is cheap, and time is money. But doesn't too much slack
space hurt performance? Or did I misunderstand what I read?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dirickson Steve [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 5:12 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [HP3000-L] Image Dynamic Dataset Expansion
>
> Consider:
>
> 1)      Time is expensive, and getting more so, especially that of the
> "down" variety;
> 2)      People, especially those with training and experience, are
> expensive, and getting more so;
> 3)      Storage is cheap, getting cheaper by the day
>
> Big picture: it just doesn't pay to try to micro-manage storage,
> buying as
> little as you can get away with and having to baby-sit it to avoid
> running
> out.