HP3000-L Archives

June 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rudderow, Evan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rudderow, Evan
Date:
Mon, 9 Jun 1997 10:48:00 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

<snip>


>This is true - but with Cellular and now other devices exploding in the
>Northeastern US, overlay area codes are becoming an option that are being
>examined very seriously.  Right now, the PA PUC (Public Utility
>Commission) is stuying it, and there's a roaring debate on overlays.  Bell
>Atlantic prefers overlays as they are easier to implement, but there are
>still quite a few people who absolutely do not want the overlays and want
>another geographic area lopped off.  The problem is the 610 area code ---
>some people who just got a new area code a few years ago, may yet get
>another one.  On the Philly area at least, an overlay makes some sense.
>(I can't say "in this area" - I'm in California right now :-)

Maybe we should simpy quit using telephone numbers and convert to IPv6...

 -- Evan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2