HP3000-L Archives

March 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
StevenH343 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
StevenH343 <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 22:50:02 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> We were doing doing some performance testing on a cobol program and
> found that it seemed to take a long time to get the current date using
> the function current-date call.  We then created a test program which
> simply does a 'move current-date' 10,000 times and then a 'move
> function current-date' 10,000 times.  We found the difference in the
> amount of time it takes to make these calls significant. Has anyone
> else noticed this and do you know of a reason?
>
>
> Call                 CPU       Count   Time/call     Wall
> ===================================================================
> CURRENT-DATE          0.35     10000      0.35          1
> FUNCTION CURRENT     13.20     10000     13.20         55
> ===================================================================
> cpu: parent user =   14.18  system =    0.00
> wall seconds (since first starttime call): 58
>
>
> Ray Potts

I have changed a program to use this function. It compiles and runs ok,
but when I try to compile with the debug option the compiler aborts. Anyone
else encounter this problem?

Steve Haug

ATOM RSS1 RSS2