HP3000-L Archives

October 1997, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Landin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Landin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 09:15:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask] says...
> My company is inclined to move off the 3000 because they heard that HP
> will not support the 3000 after the year 2005?
>
> is this correct?
>

I don't think *anyone* has come out to say their platform will be
supported past 2005. HP has shown definite roadmaps for both 3000
hardware development and MPE/iX development out past the year 2000. Since
HP is still making an estimated $500M (US) on the 3000 biz, and is
beginning a new mass advertising campaign in the most visible computer
trade magazines, I think the 3000's future is bright, and at least as
certain as just about any other platform you want to name.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2