as you can turn most chemicals into something different (poison for
example) only the US should have chemical plants.
Right? and of course Israel

Oh boy, anything even Mickey Mouse but GWB


On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:41:46 -0400, Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Do this fit the facts?
>
>France and Germany were contracted to build dual purpose chemical plants
>(Chemical plants which could be theoretically converted to poison gas
>factoies).  The money for this was looted from the Oil for Food program.
>The UN officials were bribed to look the other way so this could be done.
>As long as the contracts for the chemical plants were funded, France
>and Germany were opposed to changing the Iraq situation.  As long as the
>bribe money was coming in, the UN officials were willing to let the
>situation continue.
>
>As far as the Al-Queda connection, I have not heard much on that, but
>it would not surprise me.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *