HP3000-L Archives

July 2001, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fred Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Fred Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:41:34 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I am not a disc performance expert, but I do know that on an HP 3000
(979KS/200) connected to an AutoRAID and DLT-8000, we get backup performance
of 3,97 MB/sec (with data compression). HP rates the DLT-8000 as 6.0 MB/sec
without data compression.

I think the AutoRAID is to blame. What happens if you only backup from disks
other than the AutoRAID?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chana, Harpreet TCS1C [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 31 July 2001 03:47
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Backup Performance problem on HP-UX machine.

I have one HP-9000 L-Class 3000 server with ver 11.00, with RAM 1 G.B and
one Autoraid Box. I have connected one Ultirum-230 tape drive which can
store 200 GB data in one tape. The tape performance as per HP is 30 MB per
sec.

If I am using tar command for backup I am getting 5 MB per second
performance.
If I am using dd command then I am getting 3 MB per per seconds.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2