HP3000-L Archives

May 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 May 1998 11:45:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi all,

Because of the recent interest in CM vs. OCT performance, I've posted
some old timings for a CPU-intensive benchmark at:

   http://www.allegro.com/sieve_timings.html

The program was the Sieve of Eratosthenes, calculating primes in
the range 2..8190 in a loop (100 times).

The bottom line:

   CM  times ranged from 16,543 to 49,584 CPU milliseconds;
   OCT times ranged from  2,658 to 10,741 CPU milliseconds;
   NM  times ranged from    434 to  2,150 CPU milliseconds;

(depending upon language, and optimizations selected)

Or, to put it differently, the spread from the slowest CM language
(and optimization flatgs) to the fastest NM one was a factor of 114!

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2