Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 7 May 1998 11:45:36 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi all,
Because of the recent interest in CM vs. OCT performance, I've posted
some old timings for a CPU-intensive benchmark at:
http://www.allegro.com/sieve_timings.html
The program was the Sieve of Eratosthenes, calculating primes in
the range 2..8190 in a loop (100 times).
The bottom line:
CM times ranged from 16,543 to 49,584 CPU milliseconds;
OCT times ranged from 2,658 to 10,741 CPU milliseconds;
NM times ranged from 434 to 2,150 CPU milliseconds;
(depending upon language, and optimizations selected)
Or, to put it differently, the spread from the slowest CM language
(and optimization flatgs) to the fastest NM one was a factor of 114!
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html
|
|
|