HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 May 2002 11:05:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Baier [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Contractors' Responsibilities in this New Age?
>
>
> That's what I call a monopoly. Not only tell us the software
> to us but also
> the hardware. M$ might already be the biggest shareholder of
> Intel and AMD.
>

So it is ok that HP had total control of the 3000 Hardware and OS, but for
Microsoft not to restrict anything but to simply list the hardware it has
tested and found to work is a monopoly?

You lost me.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2