Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:29:03 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Brice Yokem
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:22:35 +0000, Roy Brown
><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>In message <000001c883ec$173ad030$45b07090$@net>, Denys Beauchemin
>><[log in to unmask]> writes
>>>It would take a few years to get those things on line and I can
>>>guarantee you the eco-Nazis will fight every goosestep of the way,
>>>before they resort to outright sabotage and terrorism.
>>I call Godwin.
<snip>
>However, Godwin's Law itself can be abused, as a distraction or
>diversion, that fallaciously miscasts an opponent's argument as
>hyperbole, especially if the comparisons made by the argument are
>actually appropriate.
If anyone thinks that Denys' arguments are not hyperbole
> A 2005 Reason magazine article argued that Godwin's Law is often
>misused to ridicule even valid comparisons.[9] ;->
and that the comparisons are appropriate
then there would seem to be no way I can reach them :-(
--
Roy Brown 'Have nothing in your houses that you do not know to be
Kelmscott Ltd useful, or believe to be beautiful' William Morris
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|