On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:06:35PM -0800, Dave Oksner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:48:58PM -0500, Brice Yokem wrote:
> > Since you did not mention Bob Dole as a 'good loser', I am sure it must
> > have been a mistake on your part, not an indication of bias. Maybe you
> > do not consider him a good loser?
>
> Though Dole may have been a good loser, did that election have any
> serious accusations of voting irregularities that the last two have had?
> (You'll have to forgive my ignorance if there were; I wasn't actually
> old enough to vote in that election, so I didn't pay as much attention
> as I probably should have.)
Whoop; my mistake. I was thinking of the previous election. I was old
enough, but was in college, so there was a different reason I wasn't paying
enough attention. :-) (Amittedly, a much less excusable reason, but
it was the reason, nonetheless.)
Dave
--
+--David Oksner-----http://www.case.net/--+
|Anthony's Law of Force |
| Don't force it - get a bigger hammer. |
[log in to unmask]
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|