In article <v01510100abceb5c554b6@[134.87.19.240]>, Mike Millard
<[log in to unmask]> says:
>
>>Both Mel Rees and Gary Dietz comment on Windows 95 being "way cool". I
>>have it running on my notebook and I have to agree! The networking is
>>great. So far, everything I've thrown at it, including Reflection/X seem
>>to work flawlessly.
>>
>>M.
>
>Pssst! Going REEL cheap - Copy of "Windows '95 for Experienced Windows 3.x
>Users", only $9.99 (The 1984 Macintosh 128 that it goes with comes FREE
>...).
>
Windows95 Top Ten List
Is this what Windows95 really stands for?
 
10. The number of floppies it will ship on.
9.  The percentage of people who will have to upgrade their hardware.
8.  The number of megabytes of hard disk space required.
7.  The number of pages in the  Easy Install  version of the manual.
6.  The percentage of existing programs that won t run in the new operating
system.
5.  The number of minutes required to install.
4.  The number of calls to tech support before you get it to run.
3.  The number of people who will actually pay for the upgrade.
2.  The number of MHz required for the operating system to run.
1.  The year it was due to ship.