HP3000-L Archives

September 2006, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hoxsie, Howard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Hoxsie, Howard
Date:
Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:18:45 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Sorry.  I should not have used the word "corporate" so loosely, so I
apologize to Chuck and others for not explaining myself better.

Please see definition 2 from the Merriam-Webster Online dictionary

		Main Entry: cor*po*rate 
		Pronunciation: 'kor-p(&-)r&t
		Function: adjective
		Etymology: Latin corporatus, past participle of
corporare to make into a body, from corpor-, corpus
		1 a : formed into an association and endowed by law with
the rights and liabilities of an individual : INCORPORATED b : of or
relating to a corporation <a plan to reorganize the corporate structure>
c : of, relating to, or being the large corporations of a country or
region considered as a unit <the latest trend in corporate America> d :
having qualities (as commercialism or lack of originality) associated
with large corporations or attributed to their influence or control
<corporate rock music> <corporate art>
		2 : of, relating to, or formed into a unified body of
individuals <human law arises by the corporate action of a people -- G.
H. Sabine>

I meant the word more in the sense of not having any allowed
disagreement as opposed to the more commonly used definition of
"pertaining to corporations".  It made sense to me at the time, but
then, I get that a lot.  :-)

Thanks Chuck, for pointing that out quickly.

Kind Regards,
Howard Hoxsie

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Chuck Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Anarcho-Tyrrany

 

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Hoxsie, Howard
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 11:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT: Anarcho-Tyrrany

Federalization?  Schmederalization.  The "free America" and "presumption
of innocence" we grew up with are components of an idea once known as
'America' which no longer exist.  The Corporate Autocracy of North
America has replaced it, and it intends to keep it.

Howard

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is both sad and humorous to watch the left attack corporations as the
source of all evil and corruption in the world today.

For decades the left has had control of our education system. They spend
a great deal of time mocking concepts of integrity, ethics and personal
responsibility and attacking any parents who fight their concept of
every issue has shades of grey, nothing is black and white... Etc.

Now after several generations of their handiwork have graduated college,
moved into the business world and have assumed the mantles of power in
our major corporations, they are suddenly castigated for not acting
ethically and with integrity by the same leftists who taught them such
concepts were a joke.

Ahh... Irony.


Comments are my own, not my employer's... Etc.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2