Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Feb 1996 21:19:00 P |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve wrote after James:
>> CAPACITY: 1015 ENTRIES: 14 MAXIMUM CAPACITY: 1015
>>
>>as an example. As you can see, if a dataset is not enabled for DDX the
>>two capacities are the same. So sometime soon there should be a patch for
>>Query that will at least show users both values.
>>
>>Is that OK??
>I would rather see non-DDX sets left alone, with just the CAPACITY
>column. For DDX sets, show both CAPACITY and MAX CAP. That way, if
>the two values are equal, you can tell at a glance that this is a DDX
>set that has grown to max, and not a set with DDX disabled. Also, for
>those that choose not to enable DDX, Query's output won't change
>providing better backward compatibility.
I think Steve is exactly right. With a small increment, having
a DDX-enabled dataset be right at the max will happen
once in a while. And if it is, there would be no way to tell
from this display whether it is DDX-enabled or not. Need to
be able to do that.
Ken Sletten
|
|
|