On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:31:52 -0500, Jim Phillips
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>However, in the (not-so) new HP way of looking at things, "open" is good
and "proprietary" is bad. HP-UX is HP's "proprietary" Unix offering and may
>very well be the next sacrifice to the gods of openness. Why incur the
>costs of developing an operating system when others are willing to do it
for
>you?
Query, not knowing unix (yet!). In what way is HP-UX less (or more open)
than any other unix offering?
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *