HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Cartledge <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew Cartledge <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 03:53:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:31:52 -0500, Jim Phillips
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>However, in the (not-so) new HP way of looking at things, "open" is good
and "proprietary" is bad.  HP-UX is HP's "proprietary" Unix offering and may
>very well be the next sacrifice to the gods of openness.  Why incur the
>costs of developing an operating system when others are willing to do it
for
>you?

Query, not knowing unix (yet!). In what way is HP-UX less (or more open)
than any other unix offering?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2