HP3000-L Archives

June 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: developments for environment without posix
From:
Mark Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 9 Jun 1999 23:47:21 -0400509_iso-8859-1 On Wednesday, June 09, 1999 19:55, K.Katrak (remove) wrote:

> I think this is classic..
> It's always the little things that will tick people off. Toss a job at HP
> for a 50 cent coke? I think not, but they all start adding up don't they?

<humour>

HP gave it all up when the free doughnuts were ditched -- of course, the
customers still got them. Maybe they're back -- I think Wim was still in
power when the morning doughnuts were killed off. [...]39_9Jun199923:47:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:50:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
>I don't know yet if I'll be using RLs or XLs for the C runtime,
>but does it matter really ?

It will only matter if you use XLs (unless you transport the XLs
from your development machine as well). With the exception of
the libraries in /lib and /usr/lib, everything you need to run
something that was statically linked is present on the target
machine.  What I mean by statically linked is that you use
the RLs at link time and not use the "dependent library"
feature or explicitly named XLs.

Hope that helps.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2