Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 May 1999 11:59:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I assume that Michael's request, by making this a system variable, would
include a read-only provision, but I'd amend his request to name it,
HPDEFAULTNAMESPACE, to conform to current system variable naming
conventions. Of course, if and when user-defined system variables are
implemented, this could become a problem.
Lee Gunter
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon / Regence HMO Oregon
==========================================================
The opinions expressed, here, are mine and mine alone.
From: John Krussel <[log in to unmask]> on 05/07/99 11:36 AM
Please respond to [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: (bcc: Lee Gunter/BCBSO/TBG)
Subject: Re: Namespace Enhancement Request
Wouldn't this make it extremely easy to break applications?? Say I was a
vendor and I decided to use the HFS by setting MPEDEFAULTNAMESPACE 3. Then
some user did (quite by accident) a deletevar MPE@, nothing would work!
Wouldn't this be better if it was a change to the HPFOPEN intrinsic itself?
|
|
|