HP3000-L Archives

June 1997, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Jun 1997 15:34:39 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Dave Gale writes:

>I don't think the situation is the same for both machines. The real test
comes when the UPS and the CPU batteries fail. Yes you can build a better
mouse trap, but the 3k has the mouse trap built in so that 10 years from
now, when the CPU battery barely holds 5 minutes worth of juice, it will
still save your data and will not require you to bring back files from backups.
>
>NT requires a UPS for this kind of power fail recovery. If that UPS ever
looses one of the batteries (and it will) the real test begins.
>
>Just my point of view.
>

This might be true for older systems, but any newer hp3k system requires
a ups to avoid catastrophic disc failures (due in part to newer disk drive
"features").

Maybe I didn't stress my point enough. Its more the "you can make it so",
than that "its that way by default" that is important here. All 3k systems
are evolving to more standard based peripheral products which are requiring
these same add-on solutions.

duane percox

ATOM RSS1 RSS2