Michael writes:
...
> Opinions seem to be mixed regarding anti-spam reply addresses, but they seem
> to be tolerated as long as you include a way to determine what your "real"
> email address.  OTOH, if your post would be best responded to via private
> email, you'll rarely (if ever) get any help from Stan Sieler if the reply
> address doesn't work.

Heck...I have trouble answering my *wife*'s email sometimes.
It comes from within HP with a "From" like:   [log in to unmask]
and "fubar" is completely unknown from outside HP :(

So, she has an unintentional "anti-spam" "From" line :)

> Posting of binaries is NOT AT ALL WELCOME (this is true of virtually all non-
> binary-specific newsgroups).

Gee, you didn't direct him to the comp.sys.hp.mpe.binaries newsgroup :)

> Overall, HP3000-L is a pretty warm and friendly place -- full of generously
> helpful people.  Some of *them* can be kind of eccentric, a few are fairly
> verbose, and some are striving for curmudgeon-hood.  (The list of names for
> each of these categories is available on request).

I think it's time to start monitoring Michaels outgoing email!

> Your message was just fine!  Plain text, no attachments, lines wrapped at <80
> characters.  Can't ask for better formatting than that!

Gud speling, to!

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html