HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stigers, Greg [And]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Greg [And]
Date:
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:34:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
X-no-Archive:yes
What is the latest high availability jargon? What is the current lingo that
folks use for 99.999% up time? Using this lingo:
CHANGE "99.999" TO "100" IN ALL
LQ ALL
100% Availability

100% Availability. I like the sound of that, if that's the right lingo.

Or how about 24 x 365 x 2?

My only concern is that systems that require teams of highly-paid support
staff, and thus attracts them likes flies to carrion, have lowered
expectations to the point of making our reality sound like hyperbole.

Greg Stigers
http://www.cgiusa.com

-----Original Message-----
From: John Lee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Publicizing the e3000; Plan B

<snip>
A story
titled, "Our System Hasn't Been Down For 2 Years!!", written by reputable
users, is bound to catch the reader's eye isn't it?

John "I have a vested interest in this, too" Lee

ATOM RSS1 RSS2