HP3000-L Archives

January 2001, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Art Bahrs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Art Bahrs <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:05:49 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (114 lines)
Hi Larry ;)
   Indeed the CSL is a benefit of a given level of Interex membership (which
level is what and what they each cost are findable on Interex's website ...
I don't remember 'em...) but then we all know about my memory! hehe

   I went onto Interex's site and searched the CSL to find some port level
password programs after Doug W. kindly pointed me in a good direction for
that project... I found several of 'em!  :)

   I was wondering why the 2000 CSL tape which we recently received from
Interex didn't have a lot of the CSL programs on it??

Art "hmmm... time to troubleshoot the tape issue " Bahrs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Barnes" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Art Bahrs" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Transact database program getting slower


> I believe they are only free to those who have paid the higher subcription
> dues.  If I wrong please advise ... nicely.
>
> Art Bahrs wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom :)
> >    Ok... so a bit of a <PLUG> for the Interex CSL... are the free utils
in
> > there? if so what are the names so I can give 'em a try too :)
> >
> > Art "Free is a very good Price! (tm Tom Peterson) Portland Icon hehe"
Bahrs
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Renz" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 7:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Transact database program getting slower
> >
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > We have a no cost (f r e e) utility that will map any master data set
> > > showing a graph of the Primaries and Secodaries and the percentages of
> > > each within each percent of the set's capacity.  We will be happy to
> > > send you a copy to see what your distribution and where your peaks are
> > > within the data set(s) in question.  Let us know.
> > >
> > > Also we have a couple of other no cost utilities that set vars with
the
> > current version of TurboIMAGE and if desired each db intrinsic.
> > > Basically the same list as listed in QUERY but setting variables.  And
> > > the second no cost utility lists all data sets within a data set
> > > and almost all the info you would like to see for each data set
> > > (name, set number, MPE file name, Extent names if jumbo, the number of
> > > sectors used, the record length, media length, the data sets tied via
> > > Image Keys, average chain lengths, and more).  Let us know if you are
> > > also interested in any of these other no cost (f r e e) utilities.
> > >
> > > <Plug>
> > >
> > > Now for the plug.  We also have a tool that can measure each db call
> > > made and provide statistics on the calls to provide you information
> > > such as longest call in CPU & wall time.  This could answer how long
> > > it takes for each DBPUT to complete as well as any other db call.
> > > Let us know if you would be interested in a demo.
> > >
> > > </Plug>
> > >
> > > Tom Renz
> > >
> > > ---------------------
> > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 at 05:46:49 you wrote:
> > > >Hello everyone
> > > >
> > > >Thanks for the replies.
> > > >
> > > >My master set is 3 million records in a capacity of 6 million.  The
> > > >set is therefore only 50 percent full.
> > > >
> > > >The key item (SYGEKSNR) X10 is a 10 digit number built as follows
> > > >DDMMYYNNNN.  The whole thing satisfies some modulo 11 arithmetic.  It
> > > >could be possible that I am getting secondaries.  How can I check ?
> > > >Are there tools available for checking ?
> > > >
> > > >I am splitting my program into updating and adding and will perform
> > > >some timing tests.  I really don't know where the bottleneck is.
> > > >
> > > >The updates to the database are received every 15 minutes.  How safe
> > > >would output deferred mode be in this case ?
> > > >
> > > >I am using entry level locking to update existing records.
> > > >
> > > >We have 37 machines with varying memory configurations and Operating
> > > >system versions, but the majority are 6.0 or higher.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks again for the help
> > > >
> > > >Chris
>
> --
> Larry Barnes
> Director of I.T.
> Mitek Corp.
> 602-438-4545 x1366
> Phoenix, AZ 85040
>
> Check Us Out !
> http://www.mitekcorp.com
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2