Tim writes:

>Same here.  We've been on PP5 for a over two weeks without a problem.  But
>it would sure be nice if HP would update the C.55.03 to C.55.05. In effect,
>this version number means nothing.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A number of 3000-L postings over the years have tried to point
this fact out. Despite Stan's well written and logically correct
postings to this point, HP continues to defend their numbering
scheme while not getting the real message.

I think a little reminder is in order:

"Perception is reality"


Duane Percox ([log in to unmask]  v/650.372.0200x608 f/650.372.3386)
http://www.qss.com/          http://qwebs.qss.com/qwebs
http://qwebs.qss.com/faq3k