HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Chong <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Peter Chong <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 May 2002 11:01:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Richard Barker <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message news:<[log in to unmask]>...
> It's important to remember than the Bible never started off as a complete

>
> Yes, in Genesis, one day might mean 1, 100, 1000, etc years.  If you going
> to accept that writing 1 day in the Bible might mean something else, then
> surely none of the book can be taken literally, so throw it in the bin.  If
> God is all-powerful, why did it take him as long as 6 days and why did he
> need a rest.
I heard this formular from my friend...Time is relative...
Age of Universe/Volume of Universe = 144 Hours/Volume of Earth ?,

I might sign on wrong NG? ;-)

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2