HP3000-L Archives

January 2004, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OT: Improved Security?
From:
"Johnson, Tracy" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johnson, Tracy
Date:
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:24:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines) 
In THAT case, I take it back.  You're NOT lazy then.
It takes extra effort to set up e-mail to to have
"no_spam" address yet be one we can actually reply-to. 

BT


Tracy Johnson
MSI Schaevitz Sensors 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy Brown (Anti-Spam)
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:52 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Improved Security?
> 
> 
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
> > I did that once, setting my "Reply-To" field to
> > always have some "no_spam" adjustment to the
> > address.  It got more annoying to have to
> > un-do that every time I *DID* want my e-mails
> > replied to.
> >
> > Add to that, a number of complaints from those
> > who couldn't reply without manually adjusting
> > my address, just like this one you mention below.
> >
> > So I gave up on that and continued to use my
> > true address.  Maybe Roy isn't to be blamed for
> > "hiding", just jeered at for being too lazy.
> >
> > BT
> >
> >
> > Tracy Johnson
> > MSI Schaevitz Sensors
> 
> ??? I'm not hiding.
> 
> While the 'From:' address is 'no-spam', and may be acquired 
> by spammers, and thus results in mail to it being routed to a 
> 'Spam, Probably' folder, if you Reply to the message, you'll 
> get my plain unadorned address, and you'll reach my Inbox 
> straightaway.
> 
> Even the 'Spam, Probably' folder gets scanned for mails that 
> aren't really spam, and merit a reply. If you got a bounce, 
> it's probably becasue you sent me an 'Out of Office', to an 
> HP3000-L posting. That's wrong - it shouldn't be sent at all, 
> but if it is, it should be sent to the List, so Jeff Kell can 
> unhook you, and save everyone from the annoyance.
> 
> Apart from that, if I recognise your name, you're whitelisted 
> with me anyway.
> 
> What's with this 'jeered at for being lazy', exactly? I think 
> maybe you got the wrong guy....
> 
> Regards
> 
> Roy
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2