Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Sep 1996 18:30:21 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 96-09-19 14:27:34 EDT, [log in to unmask]
(Therm-O-Link) writes:
<< According to the "Notes From the Field" column in Infoworld's 9/16 issue:
"A sales rep for HP said the company will support NT on its "minicomputer
boxes.""
Are they talking "minicomputer" as in HP3000, or "minicomputer" as in
HP9000?
>>
Perhaps the sales rep was refering to NT running on PA-RISC architecture
machines. However, August '95 in Toronto, Wim Rowlands from HP stated that NT
would NEVER run on PA-RISC.
As NT scales upward and takes on larger loads, a PA-RISC based processor
would be a great idea. Already DEC Alpha boxes run NT at great speed.
Whilst the Intel-based servers (Pentiums and Pentium Pros) can be had in
multi-CPUs (up to eight way with 4.0, I believe), I still like a larger
single processor. I have now installed 2 HP Net Servers in the last few
weeks and I am getting ready to install 3 more within the next month (The HP
Net Servers are now my prefered NT server platform). I am planning the
deployment of a large client-server based system running on MS SQL Server 6.5
and as I scale the project, it would be nice to know that I could remain on
HP hardware for the server, even if I scaled up to a large NT server.
I might have in the past moaned about HP's decision not to port NT to
PA-RISC, I cannot remember for sure :-).
BTW, Wim Rowlands left HP in early 1996.
Maybe that sales rep has heard certain things ?
One can only hope.
Kind regards,
Denys. . .
|
|
|