Greg Cagle wrote:
> On the other hand, I find the ITRC content for UX to be pretty good.

In response to Christian Lheureux's comment:
> That being said, I could live with ITRC and its imperfections, including
> (nut not limited to..) its lack of speed, etc, if the CONTENT (what
> ultimately counts for me and what I depend on for my day-to-day
activities)
> was OK. Problem is, the content leaves much to be desired.

My response is SO WHAT! No one was questioning or even talking about UX.
That's like
Ford telling me that the Taurus is a safe car when I want to know about the
Explorer.

We are all aware that HP does whatever it can to support its UX business.
The question
is what is doing for MPE support? Is it enough?  Christian seems to think
not. Rubbing
it in that some other platform has good support does not address the issue
except to
show us that HP knows how to do it. Which we all knew.

I emphasis my normal disclaimer.
The opinions expressed herein are my own and not necessarily those of my
employer.
Yosef Rosenblatt

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *