HP3000-L Archives

April 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wayne R. Boyer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:30:18 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
In a message dated 4/22/02 7:18:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> When he asked for the part number they told him there
> was no replacement part for the sensor.  You just purchase a new stacker.
> That way you know your problem with be fixed.  That will be $1575.00 please

In general, HP has moved a long ways AWAY from the parts availablility
structure that they used to have.   I don't understand why.  If, in this
case, they charged $50 for the sensor, they couldn't help but make money on
what might cost them $5.  There is a general lack of attention to the
servicability of a lot of new equipment.  In cases like this, just don't use
HP service and use a company that sources parts from somewhere else other
than HP.  Even paying $100 for a used sensor cannibalized off of a used
stacker would be better than HP's default 'buy a new one' appproach.

Wayne Boyer
Cal-Logic

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2