HP3000-L Archives

June 1995, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris_Quant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chris_Quant <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Jun 1995 13:01:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] (Chris_Quant) writes:
>From: [log in to unmask] (Chris_Quant)
>Subject: Re: 5.0 Push Ldev 1 Free space
>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 10:58:15
>Summary: FREE SPACE MOVING TO LDEV 1
 
>In article <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] (James
Overman) writes:
>>From: [log in to unmask] (James Overman)
>>Subject: 5.0 Push Ldev 1 Free space
>>Date: 22 Jun 1995 23:20:56 GMT
>>Summary: FREE SPACE MOVING TO LDEV 1
 
>>Has anyone else seen the symptom of all the system free space moving to
>>LDEV 1 while the other discs in the MPE_Volume set fill to capacity??
>>I believe there was an earlier thread related to 5.0 PUSH having a new
>>disc allocation algorithm that causes this.  I have been monitoring
>>my 947 and ldev 1 freespace is at 56% available with ldev 2,3,4 at 7%
>>available and dropping.  Clearly if this keeps up, there will be a
>>performance bottle neck when all freespace is on LDEV 1.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2