Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 1998 13:44:58 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi John,
I wrote two systems in 1982-1983 that I *knew* would not be in use by
the year 2000, yet they were year 2000 compatible. Yes, they are
still running today. Yes, on an HP/3000. Nice little machine, that.
:-)
-Bob
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Are there any more Classic systems out there?
Author: "John D. Alleyn-Day" <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date: 1/19/98 11:52 AM
Don Cosack wrote:
>If the MPE application software you have fits your needs and provides
>for your near-term future, how could you do better than to upgrade to a
>new (or used, but higher performing) MPE/iX platform? Migration from a
>Classic is easier than any other O.S. "jump" I'm aware of by any vendor
>- it is certainly easier than going from HPUX 9.x to 10.x
Back in 1987, I read that the average life of a software program was 14
years and increasing (as a result, I made sure the software I was writing
was Y2000 compatible!). I can't imagine that this has changed any, but I
don't know what the latest figures are. Given this, it seems to me that
compatibility from one platform to the next is absolutely vital - no-one
can be expected to rewrite complete systems just because there is a need to
upgrade the hardware.
John D. Alleyn-Day
Alleyn-Day International
408-286-6421 408-286-6474 (Fax)
[log in to unmask] http://www.Alleyn-Day.com
"The man that never made a mistake never made anything"
|
|
|