HP3000-L Archives

March 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: sorting image data
From:
Mike Hornsby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Hornsby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:52:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
> Wyell's point is well taken re: performance hits on multiple sorted paths.
> Image will have to do yeoman's work to sort each of the paths for each
put,
> delete or update.

The performance issue would only exist if CATALOGUE-NUMBER is NOT added in
ascending sequence.

If the new entry's sort item is greater than the last entry's sort item in
the chain then very little additional work is required as the new entry will
simply become the last entry on the chain.

Cordially,

Mike Hornsby
Co-founder/Chief Technical Officer
Beechglen Development Inc. (www.beechglen.com)
5576 Glenway Ave.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45238

Voice (513) 922-0509
Fax (513) 347-2834
Email [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2