HP3000-L Archives

March 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 22:02:16 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
AJCTHOMAS said...

> Aaron - you might want to test the PC product for y2k compliance.  It's
not.
>
> The reason I am upset with these people is that they told me in writing
they
> would be compliant, so I made plans based on that.  Now I have to
scramble.
> Unless they make me a really good deal, it's Sayanora Cort.

You have this on a written document, and the product is not Y2K compliant?
Are there detailed plans on paper as well (like a delivery date)?

I can see the lawyers now --- which is why when I just renewed my E&O cover
(Errors and Omissions Insurance), there were four pages of questions on Y2K
alone.  If any were answered YES, your premiums quadrupled!  The insurance
companies are stockpiling cash now, to pay the soon-to-come judgements.
It's enough to keep me away from Y2K work and lay it all at HP and
Microsoft's feet, and not have to charge our clients $300 to $400 an hour,
just to cover the insurance premiums!

Joe

ATOM RSS1 RSS2