>BTW, Kerry said it loud and clear that he will not give a veto about
>US-security to anybody.
Actually, he said both the that he would and would not.

He said there would be an "global test" before going to war.
By not giving veto power to anyone, he would have to go to war even if
failing the global test.  Other wise, that is giving veto power to other
countries.

President Bush used the same principle.  Only the international community
largely failed that test so he did what he had to do without thier
permission.
Now we know that the only reason these countries attempted to take the power
to veto the war was because they were getting money from saddam and the oil
for food program.

jm


----- Original Message -----
From: "Brice Yokem" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: 10 minutes after the end of Wednesdays debate


> That's easy Brice.
> I the US goes to war alone, it pays alone and takes care of the mess.
> If you have support from other countries, they hopefully join.
> BTW, Kerry said it loud and clear that he will not give a veto about US-
> security to anybody. Didn't you hear? He said it more then once.
>
> --------------------
>
> I am still waiting to hear what would be a 'global test' for Kerry.
>
> I heard what Kerry -said-, but it does not fit with his voting record.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *