Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Sep 1996 00:42:43 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Chad Gilles wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Here are three outstanding questions!
>
>1. Does anyone out there still have BASIC V applications out there?
>2. If so, are you going to manually make your application year 2000
> compliant, or are you using consultants, contract programmers, ect.
>3. Finally, if you are using consultants, ect. which ones are you going
> to use.
1. Yes, we have a lot of BASIC V code. It runs very well and there has been
no need or interest in translating the code to another language or
rewriting the code in another language.
2. We use the CALENDAR and CLOCK intrinsic format throughout all our
BASIC V and SPL applications, so we won't have a problem until the end
of 2027. Most of the COBOL applications use CALENDAR and CLOCK, and
those that don't now use 4 digit year fields.
3. Sorry, can't help there. We haven't found anything that needs to
be changed.
John
--------------------------------------------------------------
John Korb email: [log in to unmask]
Innovative Software Solutions, Inc.
The thoughts, comments, and opinions expressed herein are mine
and do not reflect those of my employer(s), or anyone else.
|
|
|