HP3000-L Archives

September 1996, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Korb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Korb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Sep 1996 00:42:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Chad Gilles wrote:
 
>Hi all,
>
>Here are three outstanding questions!
>
>1. Does anyone out there still have BASIC V applications out there?
>2. If so, are you going to manually make your application year 2000
>   compliant, or are you using consultants, contract programmers, ect.
>3. Finally, if you are using consultants, ect. which ones are you going
>   to use.
 
 
1. Yes, we have a lot of BASIC V code.  It runs very well and there has been
   no need or interest in translating the code to another language or
   rewriting the code in another language.
 
2. We use the CALENDAR and CLOCK intrinsic format throughout all our
   BASIC V and SPL applications, so we won't have a problem until the end
   of 2027.  Most of the COBOL applications use CALENDAR and CLOCK, and
   those that don't now use 4 digit year fields.
 
3. Sorry, can't help there.  We haven't found anything that needs to
   be changed.
 
John
--------------------------------------------------------------
John Korb                            email: [log in to unmask]
Innovative Software Solutions, Inc.
 
The thoughts, comments, and opinions expressed herein are mine
and do not reflect those of my employer(s), or anyone else.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2