>
> >I Just wonder, Why they wait for 10+ year to replace the Iraq regime?
> >(de javu)
>
> In a newspaper I read the following question:
> "Is this a personal vendetta between the Bush-family and Saddam?
> Wants George W. to finish what was missed 10yrs ago.?"
>

The coalition demanded the US not go into Iraq and finish the job 10 years
ago. The mistake Bush Sr. made then was listening to them and not pushing
ahead anyway.

We wasted the last 10 years listening to the appeasers in the UN who always
demand a diplomatic solution. If 10 years of broken agreements and
violations of the UN sanctions are not enough to make the UN act, then the
UN has become nothing more than a toothless debating society.

It is long past the time for the US to exit the UN. Its membership consists
of petty dictator's who hate us for the example our freedoms give their
people and the socialist's who hate us because our system works and their's
does not. The US has the same chance of a fair hearing by the UN as
Microsoft does at a SUN convention. It is time to put our resources into
programs that actually work.

Saddam has chemical and biological weapons in his arsenal and is close to
having his nuclear weapons. Is there anyone who really believes that if he
gets them he will not use them? Of course, if we do sit back and let him
finish his weapons programs, the same people screaming at us to not attack
will scream that we cannot attack him as he marches through the middle east
because of the devastation he will cause and it is our fault for not doing
something to prevent it.

Comments are my own, not my employer's... etc.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *