HP3000-L Archives

April 2006, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:40:21 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In a message dated 4/26/06 3:15:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
[log in to unmask] writes:

> (WAY off topic)  I have a question that has been on my mind for a long 
time, 
> and I can't seem to find any consensus on the answer.  When reading about 
> commercial software, I keep running into the phrase "Proprietary property." 
 
> I have always felt the phrase is redundant, and I used to laugh at all the 
> tapes I would get from Cognos with a label declaring that the contents were 
> "proprietary property of Cognos."  Now that I have encountered the phrase 
in 
> so many places, I have begun to wonder if my assumption is based on some 
> misunderstanding of the words.
>  
> Would anyone care to weigh in on this admittedly trivial question?

Unfortunately, anything that I might perhaps say would only likely be 
probably deleteriously harmful to your cognitive understanding of the informative 
meaning of the phrase.

Wirt Atmar

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2