In a message dated 10/3/02 10:48:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> One would have to go to some lengths to use a double-
> byte encoding in COBOL....
Unicode support would be an awfully nice enhancement to COBOL.... how about
in COBOL-2010? Sure would be nice if the language standards process moved a
little faster as well.
Wayne Boyer
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *