Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Johnson, Tracy |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:51:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Given the solidity of the MANMAN application over the years, they seem
to have done a fine job on the platform.
While others died or fell into obscurity.
Tracy Johnson
Office 1-757-766-4318
[log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James B. Byrne
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:42 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] (PLUG) Archiving and Migration of
> HP3000 ManMan data
>
> On Thu, January 20, 2011 09:25, Chuck Trites wrote:
> > Not sure what you mean by COBOL written in FORTRAN?
> >
>
> It is a play on the words of an old bromide: "You can write FORTRAN
> in any Language."
>
> The FORTRAN language is really not suited to implementing a business
> application like MANMAN but that was what the authors evidently felt
> most comfortable with. Either that, or they could not afford HP's
> COBOL licence. Or, perhaps HP COBOL simply did not work reliably,
> as I discovered the hard way at NorTel in the early 80s.
>
> In any case, MANMAN's authors had to create, in FORTRAN, all of the
> structures provided directly in COBOL.
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|