Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | F. Alfredo Rego |
Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:29:04 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 8:37 AM -0700 2/13/06, Kent Wallace wrote:
>We are using Jumbo datasets. I am unfamiliar with LFDS.
I believe that this is the case with everyone (except for
a few experimental sites, such as Adager). Even we, at Adager,
do not use LFDS in production (our production databases are
small, after all, compared to Kent's). We are using LFDS in
one of our test hp3000 computers, strictly for R&D purposes.
I look forward to comments from our HP friends regarding
Craig Lalley's questions:
>Are there any performance benefits or disadvantages?
>
>I am wondering how LFDS interact with the Transaction Manager?
>Or MPE disc cache'ing.
Curious in Sun Valley,
_______________
| |
| |
| r | Alfredo http://www.adager.com
| e |
| g | F. Alfredo Rego
| a | Manager, R & D Labs
| d | Adager Corporation
| A | Sun Valley, Idaho 83353-3000 U.S.A.
| |
|_______________|
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|