HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 17:00:34 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Nick writes:

> Seems to me that there should be no problem in keeping Hewlett
>  Packard in
>  the name, e. g. Hewlett Packard Instrumentation Company.

I agree. I think that such a name would be wholly appropriate (no matter how
much confusion it now causes due to the loss of "synergy" with the "other"
HP).

It may also be time to finally add in Hewlett and Packard's silent partner,
Frederick Terman (see: http://www-
forum.stanford.edu/About/History/valley_of_hearts.html ). If Varian and HP are
the only two companies that can't trace their history back to Fairchild
Semiconductor, that isn't true for Varian and HP themselves. They are both
related and both owe their initial existences to Terman.

Thus a not all together inappropriate name might be:

      Hewlett-Packard-Terman

or

      HPT Instruments

Wirt Atmar

ATOM RSS1 RSS2