HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:21:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Interex appears to be more Inter-ux than anything else.

-----Original Message-----
From: John R. Wolff [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] FW: HP stock inquiry


Billion dollar deals do not get HP attention these days.  Currently it
seems to take upwards of 20 billion dollars to obtain HP management focus.

By the way, in the interests of full disclosure and openness, why doesn't
Interex state just exactly how many shares they have of HP stock?  An
appropriate token number to obtain HP stockholder mailings would be 1
share.  Any more than that would seem to be excessive and a conflict of
interest.

What other company stock does Interex own?

Is the Interex board embarassed to disclose this, even to the membership?

Why is this information not disclosed to Interex members?  The Interex
members elect the Interex board, afterall.

Just whose user group is it anyway?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2