No, no, no *you* don't understand. GWB wouldn't be responsible for
restoring the Sun's output level, he'd be responsible for the "no bid
contract" for Halliburton to restore the Sun's output level. And if you
play the scenario out, Halliburton would spend several years and
billions of dollars trying to get heat from the moon.
8-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Denys Beauchemin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:59 AM
To: Shahan, Ray; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [HP3000-L] OT: I love global warming!
No, no, no. You don't understand. If GWB were to restore the Sun's
output
level, that would be good for humanity and we can't have that. Don't
you
realize that everything GWB does is bad for humanity or the planet, most
times both.
Denys
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf
Of Shahan, Ray
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: I love global warming!
Denys reports: " Scientist predicts 'mini Ice Age'
ST. PETERSBURG, Russia, Feb. 7 (UPI) -- A Russian astronomer has
predicted
that Earth will experience a "mini Ice Age" in the middle of this
century,
caused by low solar activity. <snip>".
And then Denys adds " I bet you GWB is behind the plot to reduce the
Sun's output."
Hmmmm, I don't think GWB would be behind that kind of a plot, but on the
other hand, I could see GWB giving a "no bid contract" to Halliburton to
restore the sun's output level.
8-)
Have a great week!
Ray Shahan
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
