There us also the possibility that more than one umatic tape exists!
"a foolish man possess only a single copy"
At the time this would have been considered important First thing we always did upon return of an important shoot was to make a back up...either to similar tape or to a better format which at that time at a station would have been a 1 inch transport.....
Ed#
Sent from AOL on Android
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:34 PM, Stan Sieler<[log in to unmask]> wrote: Re:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:42 AM Tracy Johnson <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> So what you're saying, is you don't have a copy, you have the original.
> (Or at least the backup.)
>
> One of you must have the original, so the other must have the backup?
>
Well, not only do I have the true original, in U-Matic (preceding Betamax,
BTW),
I also had permission, not that it was needed, from Chuck Shimada.
and...
I also bought it from the owner.
The fact that Denys happened to be a board member who happens to have a
later copy is not of particular interest, sorry.
And, BTW, I have no problems with him doing anything with it.
The video, after all, should be the property of all the users, and should
not be commercialized.
That's why I'm giving the original to the museum, to make it available to
all users.
(And, that's why I paid for conversion from U-Matic to digital video
format.)
SS
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|