HP3000-L Archives

October 1998, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stigers, Greg [And]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Greg [And]
Date:
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 15:18:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
It was an interesting experience, and a pretty good use of the technology. I
did not reset my display to the recommended higher resolution, but that
turned out not to be a real problem, although I will probably try the higher
res next time. I appreciated the question and answer session at the end. Not
only was it a neat trick, it was interesting to hear what others were asking
and what answers were given.

Much of the material was rather familiar, but the refresher wasn't bad, and
I learned a few things. No one complained when I scheduled this; other
requests for training have been rejected. I guess the price was right.

The question was raised about longer sessions. I think it could work with
scheduled breaks. The question was also raised whether we would pay for such
training... that's a tougher question, since they don't let me have the
final say on spending actual money (more than one req with all the
signatures has come back with a note on it, and some of those notes say
forget it). I wonder if it were 'bundled' in some level of support, how that
would go?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Furnivall [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 2:29 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Feedback on MPE Seminar
>
> Well, it's over, and now we want to start getting some feedback.
> Please let us know, either publicly (via HP3000-L) or privately how you
> feel
> about the technology, and what the experience was like for you.
> TOny

ATOM RSS1 RSS2