Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 9 Oct 1996 08:30:14 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have Private as well, and my understanding is that it is not being
significantly enhanced any longer. Also, Private will age passwords as
a function of time, but I'm not aware that it ages by number of logons
per user. If I'm incorrect, I ask forgiveness.
Security/3000 from VeSoft ($) and SAFE/3000 from Monterey Software
($$$) are two other excellent security packages which you might
investigate. SAFE/3000 does *NOT* use logon UDCs but integrates with
the OS via the AIF. We're still considering moving to the latter
product.
Lee Gunter [log in to unmask]
HMO Oregon
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Security re User Passwords
Author: Bryan O'Halloran <[log in to unmask]> at ~INTERNET
Date: 10/10/96 1:08 AM
Debbie Blumenthal asked
>A question for all you experts...
>We've been discussing certain security aspects here, specifically
>for the HP3000. There are (at least) two goals:
>- specify a number of sign-ons (preferrably allowed to set number by
>Userid), after which the user is prompted for a new password.
>- limit number of concurrent sign-ons under same Userid, if possible,
>by time of day (i.e. limit of 10 "USERX" 9am - 4pm)
Private from O.C.S. will perform the above. It works on using logon UDCs
which is a bit of a problem because incoming FTP users can bypass it. We
bought it so long ago that I am not sure of the price but I think was in
the expensive end of the market.
Bryan O'Halloran
|
|
|