Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Trudeau, James L |
Date: | Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:32:54 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Howdy,
Bout wore my snipper out on this one. But to be to the point:
Through various versions/patches/expresses of the MPE/iX OS
which they botched and my own occsional/rare/near-non-existant
clumsiness, there have been times when I reached the "care"
threshold. As in "If I kill this process I face dire consequences".
The consequences although in detail cannot be known but the
larger view of killing the process is I don't *CARE*. I want
it dead.....now! We will worry about the body count later.
It's my head on the block and if I wanna choppit well....
I've wished for years that HP had the HARIKARI command
available.
Jim - saw in the paper that the railroad misrouted our rain shipment to Ft.
Worth. Bodes ill - Trudeau
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Madigan [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 1999 11:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: STUCK JOBS (somewhat longish)
X-no-Archive:yes
<snip>
<cussing and fuming>
"Reboot the system." Intentionally shut down a *production* system and
interrupt the work of several hundred users to terminate ONE stuck process.
<shout>
TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!!
</shout>
<snip>
The time has long passed where HP needs to balance the slight possibility
of corrupting files against the reality of having to bring everyone's
production work to a screeching halt to terminate one offender. Especially
if MPE is truly meant to be a "high availability" operating system. IMHO,
"rebooting the system" is a LAST RESORT measure. If I ever feel the need
to practice "rebooting the system," I'll whip together a few NT boxes,
throw on a couple of Micro$oft apps and wait for the damn thing to crash.
I shouldn't have to wait long.
See you on the other side, Ross.
</cussing and fuming>
<snip>
|
|
|