HP3000-L Archives

March 2003, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Landin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Landin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:32:34 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
 On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:31:58 -0600 (Central Standard Time), John Lee
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Connie-
>
>I second what Denys said, plus I believe that the tape itself dictates to
>the drive how fast it should operate at?  In other words, if you use DDS2
>tapes, you're only getting DDS2 performance, and not the faster DDS3
>performance.

True, but with a longer tape you won't run into EOT quite as fast. I
used to use DDS2 tapes in DDS1 drives ... I still got DDS1 speeds and
recording densities, but the longer tape gave me a proportionate
increase in total storage.

However, just because I did it doesn't mean I recommend it. As Denys
points out, drives and media are designed together, and mixing one
media with an older drive might spell disaster. Proceed at your OWN
RISK.

Considering how critical backups are, it is NOT the place to be
looking to save a few dollars.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2