HP3000-L Archives

July 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 21:20:06 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
> I've been and still am roaming about the net to come up with some
> "authoritative" documentation about leap day in the year 2000.  Some
> time ago there was quite an extensive thread on the list dealing
> with this and other Y2K issues.  I've checked the archives - lot of
> good stuff but nothing that management here considers "authoritative".

If we're taking a vote, I propose that we get all the leap years out of the
way right now for many years to come!

VOTE YES FOR FEBRUARY 42ND!

(Wouldn't it suck to be born on February 42nd?)

Sincerely,
T.J. Mannos

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum

ATOM RSS1 RSS2