Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | PAUL,GUY (HP-Boise,ex1) |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:05:53 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Odds are you are switching tapes around the 65,501st file
This is a known issue when using DDS + Labeled media.
I believe this is fixed if you use DLT and have patch MPELX94 or its
supercede installed but I'm not sure on that point.
Guy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark Sprowls
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: STORE problem. Why a second tape?
>
>
> We have implemented a new total backup job for one of our
> customers, and it now wants a second tape. The old job still
> requires one tape. The old job did the following:
>
> :FILE TOTBKXL;DEV=TAPE
> :STORE @[log in to unmask]@;*TOTBKXL;DIRECTORY
>
> The new job does the following:
>
> :FILE T;DEV=TAPE;LABEL=SYSBKP
> :BUILD STROUT;REC=-150,,F,ASCII;DISC=10000000;TEMP
> :STORE @[log in to unmask]@;*T;DIRECTORY;PROGRESS=2 > STROUT
>
> The differences are:
> *The new job uses a labeled tape
> *The new job uses the PROGRESS option
> *The new job redirects the STORE output to a file to be
> checked for errors
>
> Does anyone see any reason why one of these differences would
> cause the backup now to span two tapes? The customer says
> they are using only 125m DDS tapes.
>
> Any help is much appreciated!
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|